Show Menu


Is 100 calories of chips the same as 100 calories of fish? First, in a literal sense, a calorie is always a calorie since it’s a unit of energy. Energy cannot be made or destroyed, only transferred from one state to another.

When discussing changes in body fat, this is most closely related to energy balance over time – that is, whether you are in a calorie surplus or a calorie deficit. So, the calories in the food you eat is the key driver of whether you gain fat or not.

However, not all calories are treated equally within the body. Some of the calories in the food you consume will be used to digest, absorb, and metabolise the rest of the food, and some will be burned off as heat. This is known as the ‘thermic effect of feeding’ (TEF).

Protein has a TEF quite a bit higher than carbohydrates and fats, meaning that, in simplistic terms, more of the calories are ‘burned off’, leaving fewer to get stored as fat. Therefore a higher protein intake can be advantageous.

• Fat provides 9 calories per gram, and its TEF is 0–3%
• Carbohydrate provides 4 calories per gram, and its TEF is 5–10%
• Protein provides 4 calories per gram, and its TEF is 20–30%

A higher protein diet can also suppress appetitepreserve muscle mass and reduce food intake in real-world conditions.

Whilst a high-protein diet has this metabolic advantage, foods of all types that are more satiating (filling) can make sticking to a calorie deficit easier. 

Based on research on the satiety index, food volume, fibre, and water content all appear to influence how filling a food is. Examples of some of the top ranked foods in this study included potatoes, fish, oats, and oranges. 

By contrast, an ultra-processed diet (e.g. junk-type food) can result in a significantly higher calorie consumption. It may be wise, then, to limit  junk food to better control your calorie intake.

Regardless of a food’s TEF, to maintain weight, we need the energy equation to balance (energy intake = total energy expenditure).

Energy Intake (food & drink) = RMR + TEF + Activity Thermogenesis

Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is the amount of energy required to maintain the body’s most basic functions at rest.

‘Activity thermogenesis’ refers to your energy expenditure from all activity. That is formal physical activity (e.g. training) as well as spontaneous activities such as fidgeting, maintaining one’s posture, walking etc. known as NEAT (non-exercise activity thermogenesis). 

Take-home: for fat loss, keeping body fat low and general health, design a varied diet with ample protein and fibre and one that is rich in micronutrients (vitamins and minerals).

Kevin Garde
Nutritionist and Bodyscan Consultant

What is a Weight Loss Calculator?
Many people try to lose weight or body fat and struggle to see results. But, weight loss doesn’t have to be a confusing shot in the dark. 
There are incredible and valuable tools available to help you track and evaluate your health and fitness, and that’s where we come in. 
A weight loss calculator can be used to accurately track your progress, as opposed to a traditional scale which has many other factors coming into play.
These calculators are done with a body scan.
Accurate Body Fat Measurement
With an accurate body fat measurement, you’ll be able to quickly and precisely measure your body’s fat, tissue and bones. 
This will help you set goals and start your weight loss journey. 
Here at Bodyscan, we can get you a specific and scientific reading in minutes. This is all thanks to our DEXA body fat measurement system conveniently located in London. 
You can use these scans to see exactly what is working and what is not. 
The Benefits of a Weight Loss Calculator
The benefits of DEXA scans and weight loss calculations are hard to ignore. They can stop you from wasting valuable time on resources that simply do not do the job for you. 
They can also be powerful tools for people looking to increase their muscle mass and increase their endurance. 
Health tracking has never been easier than with our technology. You will get a sneak peek into your muscle and body fat ratio allowing you to make educated decisions on what to do next. 
Book Yours Today: 
If you’re looking to book your first DEXA scan to help you with your weight loss calculator then click here ( 
This body composition analysis will give you all the information needed to accurately measure body fat and composition and start your health and wellness journey. 

High intensity interval training (HIIT) has gained popularity in recent decades.

It refers to any form of activity that alternates high intensity activity with periods of lower to moderate intensity activity (eg, 20-second sprint intervals with 60 seconds of walking, jogging or even complete rest.

By contrast, aerobic or steady state training (eg, jogging) is where a reasonably steady intensity is maintained for an extended period (say, 20 minutes or more).

For some, HIIT is revered as the single best way to burn calories in a time efficient manner.

With numerous variations under the broad umbrella of HIIT methods (e.g. Tabata, a short interval training protocol), HIIT can indeed be a time-efficient way to improve conditioning and overall fitness.

Perhaps because it also shares a couple of metabolic traits with resistance training (short bursts of intense effort followed by a period of rest, and an ‘afterburn’ effect), it’s often sold as a way to burn fat with minimal loss of lean mass.

But actually, HIIT does not always translate to an improvement in body composition or fat-loss efforts.

Fat Loss
For a given amount of work, you will burn more calories with HIIT compared to aerobic or steady state training. There is also a greater ‘afterburn’ effect, meaning you will continue to burn more calories after you’ve finished the exercise.

In most instances, however, the amount of energy burned afterwards, known as excess post-exercise energy expenditure (EPEE) and related to post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC), is considerably overplayed.

When comparing a 20-minute high intensity interval session versus a 30-minute continuous running session at a lower intensity, the interval session resulted in 57 more calories burned. This figure included both the calories burned during the exercise session as well as those burned afterwards (EPEE) and concluded that the major contribution to weight loss from both steady-state jogging and HIIT was from the energy expended during the actual exercise. The afterburn effect was “of negligible physiological significance as far as weight loss is concerned.”

It’s well worth noting that the researchers in this study made sure that the total amount of work done was equal between the two sessions.

The main benefit of interval training (HIIT) for fat loss is not, then, the calories burned per se but rather the time efficiency. For those with busy lifestyles, HIIT may be a preferable method to expend more calories in less time but a true HIIT session (repeated all-out sprints for 30 seconds-plus) is not for everyone.

The problem with regular HIIT is that it is taxing on the body and may interfere with strength and muscle gain by causing too much fatigue. Higher intensity means higher recovery and thus may prevent effective, progressive resistance training over time.

Given the fact that steady state training involves far less recovery, a reduction in injury risk and a lower requirement for cardiovascular fitness compared to HIIT, it may be a more feasible approach for beginners or people who are overweight or obese. Similarly, for those looking to optimise muscle building, it may be prudent to steer clear of regular engagement in true HIIT sessions.

Both HIIT and steady state training are effective methods for increasing overall fitness and can be used as a fat-loss tool to complement your nutrition. In the context of fat loss, adherence is the primary predictor of success, so choose a training protocol that you know you can stick to rather than worry about what type of ‘afterburn’ it might give you.

Kevin Garde
Nutritionist and Bodyscan Consultant