Show Menu


Firstly, measuring your body fat is important for determining how fit you are. It is a well-known fact that muscle weighs more than fat. It’s hard to know whether the weight you are carrying is positive weight (muscle) or negative weight (fat). Even if three people are the same height, and appear to have similar builds, they can still differ in weight on account of their body-fat percentage. 

Often, athletes appear medically overweight when they use scales. In actual fact, they just have increased amounts of muscle. They usually have a low body-fat: male athletes usually have 6 – 13% body fat, and female athletes usually have 14 – 20%.

Whether you are an athlete or not, measuring body-fat is important to ascertain how healthy you are. Excess fat around the abdomen can contribute to high risks of diabetes, poor circulation, heart disease and cancer. 

There are many different kinds of fat, the most dangerous of which is ‘visceral fat’. This often accumulates around the abdomen and is the result of eating fatty foods or consuming too much alcohol. Finding out just how much fat you have accumulated by having a DEXA body composition scan can let you know whether you have a good diet, and help discover what you can do to become healthier. 

Our DEXA body composition scans are accurate, precise and consistent. They will provide you with a detailed analysis of your body-fat percentage and allow you to fully understand your body. Our cutting edge technology will help you avoid the dangerous effects of excess body fat including diabetes, poor circulation, heart disease and cancer. Countless people who have had a DEXA body scan agree that we provide the best way to measure body fat. 

If you are looking to build muscle we can help with that too. Our highly-trained team will let you know exactly what you need to do to build muscle and become fitter, happier and stronger.

A change in body tissue mass is most closely related to energy balance over time. As such, reducing carbohydrates is one viable method to initiate fat loss if it leads to a prolonged energy/calorie deficit over time. Carbohydrates alone are not inherently fattening.

Of course, carbohydrates can contribute to fat gain if in an energy/calorie surplus: indirectly by blunting fat oxidation (the burning of fatty acids for fuel) or directly via ‘de novo lipogenesis’ (the process of converting carbohydrates to fats). De novo lipogenesis is, however, an energy-costly process and does not occur in most real-life scenarios. Dietary fat, on the other hand, does not need to be converted and is stored in adipose tissue far more efficiently.

At this point it is important to differentiate between fat burning (i.e. fat oxidation) and loss of body fat. For most people, the term ‘fat-burning’ will simply mean that you’re losing body fat. For those who have a deeper understanding of human physiology, fat burning can be viewed as slang for fat oxidation. Fat oxidation occurs when we oxidise fatty acids to generate ATP (adenosine triphosphate) which can be used for energy production. 
Key point – just because you are burning more fat for fuel (eg, on a high-fat and/or ketogenic diet) does not necessarily mean we are burning the fat that is stored in our fat tissue and thus losing body fat. Remember, changes in body fat tissue are most closely related to energy balance over time and as a result body fat loss will be determined by net fat balance (fat storage minus fat oxidation). So, yes, although you do burn more fat on a high-fat diet, you have more of it to burn.A classic study by Hall and colleagues in a tightly controlled setting showed that carbohydrate restriction was not physiologically advantageous for fat loss. The study took place in a metabolic ward and looked to compare the effect of different carbohydrate and fat intakes on energy intake, output, and substrate balance while holding calories and protein constant during hypocaloric conditions (30% energy deficit). Interestingly, net fat balance was reduced to a greater extent in the restricted fat group i.e. subjects who restricted fat intake lost more body fat, albeit ~36g/day.

A more recent, year-long randomised control trial found that a low-carb and a low-fat diet produced similar weight loss and improvement in health markers. Insulin production was also found to have no impact on predicting weight loss success. The results of this study contribute to a large body of evidence suggesting that, for fat loss, neither low-carb nor low-fat is superior – once total calorie intake and protein intake are equated.

If insulin and carbohydrate consumption alone were truly the cause of fat gain and therefore a major contributor towards the obesity-epidemic, then why are there numerous tribes across the world who eat high carbohydrate diets and are devoid of obesity-related diseases? Some examples include the Okinawans of Japan, Kitavans of the Pacific Islands, and Kuna Indians in Panama. The Kitavans, who consume a diet with almost 70% of calories coming from carbohydrates, are described ‘by extreme leanness (despite food abundance)’.
​With overwhelming evidence showing no meaningful difference between a low-fat diet and a low-carb for fat loss success, the question remains, why do so many people get fantastic fat loss results going on a low-carb diet? 

It is important to acknowledge that restricting carbs from the diet leads to a reduction in a whole host of calorie-dense goodies: eg, pizza, burgers, biscuits, pastries, doughnuts, to name but a few… note – these foods contain dietary fat too! The combination of both dietary fat and carbohydrate together, positively impacts the palatability of a food. The tastier and/or more rewarding a certain food is, the easier it is to over-consume.

Restricting foods similar to the examples listed above, can often automatically improve the nutrient density/quality of the diet. Additionally, consuming less carbohydrate may have the added benefit of increasing total dietary protein intake. Increasing protein intake can lead to a spontaneous reduction in total calories, creating an energy imbalance. As a result, fat loss shortly ensues.

The truth is that cutting carbs can be a viable fat loss strategy for some, if it helps you eat less. If, however, cutting carbs negatively affects your performance, makes you feel miserable, moody, and always hunger, you should consider alternative options.

To summarise, adherence is the make or break of dieting success and the biggest predictor for long-term weight maintenance. Dietary strategies that optimise adherence should be the primary focus for those looking to lose body fat. This process can be enhanced by regular professional contact and guidance, to help implement bespoke behaviour and lifestyle modifications to support one’s goals.

A low-carbohydrate diet is simply a tool in the fat loss toolbox and works wonders for some. Is it an absolute necessity for fat loss success for everyone, in every situation? Definitely not!

Kevin Garde
Nutritionist & Bodyscan Consultant
PRISM Nutrition